Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM?

Details Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM? Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM?

2004-02-06

arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0402149v1

Astrophys.J. 604 (2004) L5-L8

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

ApJL, 11 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

10.1086/383413

We review the evidence for substructures from the anomalous flux ratios in gravitational lenses. Using high-resolution numerical simulations, we show that at typical image positions, the fraction of surface mass density in substructures is <~ 0.5% with mass above 10^{-4} virial masses in the ``concordance'' LCDM cosmology. Substructures outside the virial radius (but projected at typical lens image positions) only increase the fraction moderately. Several effects, in particular baryonic settling and the requirement of compactness, may further decrease the predictions by a factor of few. The predicted fraction with appropriate properties thus appears to be lower than that required by lensing, although both are still uncertain. More speculative substructures such as massive black holes (M ~ 10^5-10^6 solar masses) in the halo may offer viable alternatives.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Anomalous Flux Ratios in Gravitational Lenses: For or Against CDM? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-507485