Statistics – Applications
Scientific paper
2011-11-21
Statistics
Applications
12 pages, 10 figures
Scientific paper
In comparative proteomics studies, LC-MS/MS data is generally quantified using one or both of two measures: the spectral count, derived from the identification of MS/MS spectra, or some measure of ion abundance derived from the LC-MS data. Here we contrast the performance of these measures and show that ion abundance is the more sensitive. We also examine how the conclusions of a comparative analysis are influenced by the manner in which the LC-MS/MS data is `rolled up' to the protein level, and show that divergent conclusions obtained using different rollups can be informative. Our analysis is based on two publicly available reference data sets, BIATECH-54 and CPTAC, which were developed for the purpose of assessing methods used in label-free differential proteomic studies. We find that the use of the ion abundance measure reveals properties of both data sets not readily apparent using the spectral count.
Milac Thomas I.
Randolph Timothy W.
Wang Pei
No associations
LandOfFree
Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-375794