Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies

Statistics – Applications

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

12 pages, 10 figures

Scientific paper

In comparative proteomics studies, LC-MS/MS data is generally quantified using one or both of two measures: the spectral count, derived from the identification of MS/MS spectra, or some measure of ion abundance derived from the LC-MS data. Here we contrast the performance of these measures and show that ion abundance is the more sensitive. We also examine how the conclusions of a comparative analysis are influenced by the manner in which the LC-MS/MS data is `rolled up' to the protein level, and show that divergent conclusions obtained using different rollups can be informative. Our analysis is based on two publicly available reference data sets, BIATECH-54 and CPTAC, which were developed for the purpose of assessing methods used in label-free differential proteomic studies. We find that the use of the ion abundance measure reveals properties of both data sets not readily apparent using the spectral count.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Analyzing LC-MS/MS data by spectral count and ion abundance: two case studies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-375794

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.