Analysis of long-term variations in the geomagnetic poloidal field intensity and evaluation of their relationship with global geodynamics

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

19

Global Geodynamics, Palaeointensity Variations, Pangaea Evolution, Reversal Frequency

Scientific paper

The 1167 published cooling unit (CU) palaeointensity estimates contained in the 400-10 Ma portion of the PINT global database were rigorously filtered according to accurate age determinations, palaeodirectional reliability, recognition of polarity and the method of palaeointensity acquisition. The remaining 865 estimates (group 1) were further filtered to ensure self-consistency, reducing the data set to 425 estimates (group 2). Group 1 and 2 data were clustered into temporally and/or spatially distinct rock suites (RS) enabling each part of the record to be assessed for potential biasing by overrepresentation of palaeosecular variation (PSV). The record was segmented according to the distribution of the data, rather than using arbitrary time windows, to ensure quasi-consistent behaviour within each segment. Differences between these segments clearly indicate that a significant long-timescale (107 and 108 yr) variation of the mean geomagnetic poloidal field intensity (GPFI) occurred during the 400-10 Ma period and hence that changing lowermost mantle conditions affect the capacity of the geodynamo to generate a poloidal field. Both the mean dipole moment and its standard deviation appear to be a function of the range of values each CU may adopt at one particular time. This range is itself controlled by the variation of the maximum limit of dipole moment, while the value of the minimum limit remains relatively constant. Tentative support is provided for the recent suggestion that PSV may have been reduced during the Cretaceous normal superchron (CNS), though more data are needed in the range 120-60 Ma to confirm this. No conclusive evidence was found to support the suggestion that the GPFI record may be biased towards low or high values by palaeointensity determinations obtained using methods that do not adopt pTRM checks. Indeed, offsets caused by unreliable data in well-represented parts of the record are likely to be random and cancel one another out.
When GPFI variation is analysed at a sufficiently high resolution to allow comparisons with the geomagnetic polarity reversal frequency (RF), it is not possible to confirm whether the two parameters are anticorrelated, decoupled or related in some more complex way. However, it is clear that GPFI and RF are definitely not positively correlated as has been previously suggested. The present database documents sharp increases in GPFI around the onset times of the two recognized superchrons, itself implying an anticorrelation. The implications, for geodynamo and mantle modelling, of both an anticorrelation and a decoupling of the geomagnetic parameters are discussed briefly.
A generic geodynamic model is proposed to explain the relationship between observed long-term changes in GPFI and global geodynamic processes. The model predicts that changes in GPFI result from a chain of geodynamic processes extending from crust to core, beginning with plate reorganizations at the surface and culminating in increases in the vigour of outer core convection. Supercontinents are transient surface expressions of such geodynamic processes and provide the potential to test the generic model. Four time stages are proposed to describe the major long-term changes in GPFI since the Early Devonian: 400-350, 350-250, 250-175 and 175-10 Ma. The GPFI features within these stages are convincingly explained within the context of major events in the evolutionary cycle of Pangaea. Two major avalanching and mantle reorganization events, facilitating whole-mantle convection, are proposed; one linked with the amalgamation of Pangaea, the other (possibly less catastrophic) with the dispersal phase of the supercontinent. These events were separated by a period of mantle insulation during the time when the supercontinent was assembled and a layered mantle convection regime existed. The explanations are consistent with independent evidence from seismology, mantle modelling and mantle dynamics, though some ambiguities and intriguing relationships remain, which can only be addressed by the addition of high-quality palaeointensity data in key time windows targeted by the statistical analysis. The potential of using GPFI variation from the Archaean to the Mid-Palaeozoic to enhance our understanding of Earth's early geodynamic evolution is highlighted. Such data are currently lacking and their acquisition represents a significant challenge for future palaeointensity work.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Analysis of long-term variations in the geomagnetic poloidal field intensity and evaluation of their relationship with global geodynamics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Analysis of long-term variations in the geomagnetic poloidal field intensity and evaluation of their relationship with global geodynamics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Analysis of long-term variations in the geomagnetic poloidal field intensity and evaluation of their relationship with global geodynamics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-922097

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.