Other
Scientific paper
Apr 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995icar..114..387s&link_type=abstract
Icarus (ISSN 0019-1035), vol. 114, no. 2, p. 387-402
Other
10
Albedo, Asteroids, Light Curve, Periodic Variations, Rotation, Surface Roughness, Astronomical Photometry, Galileo Project, Galileo Spacecraft
Scientific paper
Galileo-based models for the shape of 951 Gaspra and the global-average photometric behavior of its surface have been used to model a representative subset of the asteroid's telescopic lightcurves. Fitting the synthetic lightcurves to the observed timing of lightcurve extrema, and knowing the orientation of Gaspra's axes at the time of the Galileo flyby, leads to a sidereal rotation period for the asteroid of 7.042024 +/- 0.000020 hr, a slight change from the period reported by Magnusson et al. (1992). Initially, the shapes, amplitudes, and absolute photometry of the synthetic and observed lightcurves agree with each other to within 0.05-0.1 mag. Small modifications to the Gaspra shape model on sides of the asteroid poorly imaged by Galileo (changes of 700 m or less in the southern hemisphere at longitudes 90 deg-270 deg W) reduce the typical discrepancies to approximately 0.05 mag in lightcurve shape and less than 0.03 mag in absolute photometry. The result demonstrates that Earth-based lightcurves can be used to refine the shape of a spacecraft-imaged irregular object in areas that are poorly constrained by the spacecraft observations. The consistency and phase-angle dependence of the Galileo-based model for Gaspra photometry, supports the accuracy of the absolute calibration of the Galileo SSI camera, and confirms the Earth-based determination of the V-filter geometric albedo of the asteroid (0.22 +/- 0.03; Tholen et al., submitted for publication). Remaining discrepancies between the synthetic and observed lightcurves show no indication of systematic latitudinal variations in albedo and also cannot be explained entirely by isolated albedo spots. These discrepancies are most likely caused by (1) small, remaining, hard-to-constrain errors in the Gaspra shape model and/or (2) moderate variations in macroscopic roughness across the asteroid's surface, in particular making longitudes 130 deg to 300 deg W moderately rougher than the opposite hemisphere.
Belton Michael J. S.
Helfenstein Paul
Simonelli Damon P.
Thomas Peter C.
Veverka Joe
No associations
LandOfFree
Analysis of Gaspra lightcurves using Galileo shape and photometric models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Analysis of Gaspra lightcurves using Galileo shape and photometric models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Analysis of Gaspra lightcurves using Galileo shape and photometric models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1829682