An Ultraviolet-Selected Galaxy Redshift Survey - II: The Physical Nature of Star Formation in an Enlarged Sample

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

27 pages, 19 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Scientific paper

10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03140.x

We present further spectroscopic observations for a sample of galaxies selected in the vacuum ultraviolet (UV) at 2000 \AA from the FOCA balloon-borne imaging camera of Milliard et al. (1992). This work represents an extension of the initial study of Treyer et al. (1998). Our enlarged catalogue contains 433 sources; 273 of these are galaxies, nearly all with redshifts z=0-0.4. Nebular emission line measurements are available for 216 galaxies, allowing us to address issues of reddening and metallicity. The UV and Halpha luminosity functions strengthen our earlier assertions that the local volume-averaged star formation rate is higher than indicated from earlier surveys. Moreover, internally within our sample, we do not find a steep rise in the UV luminosity density with redshift over 0

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

An Ultraviolet-Selected Galaxy Redshift Survey - II: The Physical Nature of Star Formation in an Enlarged Sample does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with An Ultraviolet-Selected Galaxy Redshift Survey - II: The Physical Nature of Star Formation in an Enlarged Sample, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and An Ultraviolet-Selected Galaxy Redshift Survey - II: The Physical Nature of Star Formation in an Enlarged Sample will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-528548

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.