Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jul 2010
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2010geoji.182..454t&link_type=abstract
Geophysical Journal International, Volume 182, Issue 1, pp. 454-460.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
5
Surface Waves And Free Oscillations, Seismic Tomography, Theoretical Seismology, Wave Propagation, Crustal Structure
Scientific paper
The success of recent ambient noise tomographic studies is now understood to arise due to cross-correlation properties documented in the acoustics community since the 1950s. However, despite the fact that Aki's 1957 spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) work yields identical analytical results to certain noise correlation results, the precise relationship between SPAC and time-domain cross-correlation remains not entirely transparent. Here, we present an explicit comparison of the two approaches and clarify that SPAC theory is indeed equivalent to the cross-correlation theory used for recent noise tomography studies. This equivalence allows theoretical work from each field to be applied to the other, and we illustrate a few examples of this.
Moschetti Morgan P.
Tsai Victor C.
No associations
LandOfFree
An explicit relationship between time-domain noise correlation and spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) results does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with An explicit relationship between time-domain noise correlation and spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) results, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and An explicit relationship between time-domain noise correlation and spatial autocorrelation (SPAC) results will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-957151