Accuracy and effectualness of closed-form, frequency-domain waveforms for non-spinning black hole binaries

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

29 pages, 8 figures, 1 table. Accepted for publication in Phys. Rev. D

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.83.024006

The coalescences of binary black hole (BBH) systems, here taken to be non-spinning, are among the most promising sources for gravitational wave (GW) ground-based detectors, such as LIGO and Virgo. To detect the GW signals emitted by BBHs, and measure the parameters of the source, one needs to have in hand a bank of GW templates that are both effectual (for detection), and accurate (for measurement). We study the effectualness and the accuracy of the two types of parametrized banks of templates that are directly defined in the frequency-domain by means of closed-form expressions, namely 'post-Newtonian' (PN) and 'phenomenological' models. In absence of knowledge of the exact waveforms, our study assumes as fiducial, target waveforms the ones generated by the most accurate version of the effective one body (EOB) formalism. We find that, for initial GW detectors the use, at each point of parameter space, of the best closed-form template (among PN and phenomenological models) leads to an effectualness >97% over the entire mass range and >99% in an important fraction of parameter space; however, when considering advanced detectors, both of the closed-form frequency-domain models fail to be effectual enough in significant domains of the two-dimensional [total mass and mass ratio] parameter space. Moreover, we find that, both for initial and advanced detectors, the two closed-form frequency-domain models fail to satisfy the minimal required accuracy standard in a very large domain of the two-dimensional parameter space. In addition, a side result of our study is the determination, as a function of the mass ratio, of the maximum frequency at which a frequency-domain PN waveform can be 'joined' onto a NR-calibrated EOB waveform without undue loss of accuracy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Accuracy and effectualness of closed-form, frequency-domain waveforms for non-spinning black hole binaries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Accuracy and effectualness of closed-form, frequency-domain waveforms for non-spinning black hole binaries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Accuracy and effectualness of closed-form, frequency-domain waveforms for non-spinning black hole binaries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-241945

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.