Accretion column disruption in GX 1+4

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

10 pages, 2 figures, minor abstract typo and wording of final paragraph corrected

Scientific paper

10.1086/317279

Daily observations of the binary X-ray pulsar GX 1+4 were made with the Rossi X-ray Timing Explorer (RXTE) satellite between 1997 May 16-20 as part of a four-month monitoring program. On May 17 the sharp dips normally observed in the lightcurve were all but absent, resulting in a pulse fraction f_p approx. 0.5 instead of the more typical value of approx. 0.8 measured before and after. Also observed was a dramatic hardening of the 2-40 keV phase-averaged spectrum. The power-law photon index was 1.16 +/- 0.02, whereas values of 1.6-2.0 are more typical. In terms of a Comptonization continuum component, the optical depth for scattering was tau approx 19, with 4-6 the usual range for RXTE spectra (Galloway 2000). Pulse-phase spectrosopy indicates that tau is decreased relative to the phase-averaged value around the primary minimum, where an increase is normally observed. The reduced depth of the dip is interpreted as disruption of the accretion column, and the accompanying spectral variation suggests a substantially different accretion regime than is usual for this source.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Accretion column disruption in GX 1+4 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Accretion column disruption in GX 1+4, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Accretion column disruption in GX 1+4 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-545657

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.