Absence of significant cross-correlation between WMAP and SDSS

Details Absence of significant cross-correlation between WMAP and SDSS Absence of significant cross-correlation between WMAP and SDSS

2010-01-22

arxiv.org/abs/1001.4000v2

Astron.Astrophys. 513, 3L-7L (2010)

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

5 pages and three figures. Accepted for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics. V2 corrected to match the published paper

Scientific paper

AIMS. Several authors have claimed to detect a significant cross-correlation between microwave WMAP anisotropies and the SDSS galaxy distribution. We repeat these analyses to determine the different cross-correlation uncertainties caused by re-sampling errors and field-to-field fluctuations. The first type of error concerns overlapping sky regions, while the second type concerns non-overlapping sky regions. METHODS. To measure the re-sampling errors, we use bootstrap and jack-knife techniques. For the field-to-field fluctuations, we use three methods: 1) evaluation of the dispersion in the cross-correlation when correlating separated regions of WMAP with the original region of SDSS; 2) use of mock Monte Carlo WMAP maps; 3) a new method (developed in this article), which measures the error as a function of the integral of the product of the self-correlations for each map. RESULTS. The average cross-correlation for b>30 deg. is significantly stronger than the re-sampling errors--both the jack-knife and bootstrap techniques provide similar results--but it is of the order of the field-to-field fluctuations. This is confirmed by the cross-correlation between anisotropies and galaxies in more than the half of the sample being null within re-sampling errors. CONCLUSIONS. Re-sampling methods underestimate the errors. Field-to-field fluctuations dominate the detected signals. The ratio of signal to re-sampling errors is larger than unity in a way that strongly depends on the selected sky region. We therefore conclude that there is no evidence yet of a significant detection of the integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect. Hence, the value of Omega_\Lambda ~ 0.8 obtained by the authors who assumed they were observing the ISW effect would appear to have originated from noise analysis

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Absence of significant cross-correlation between WMAP and SDSS does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Absence of significant cross-correlation between WMAP and SDSS, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Absence of significant cross-correlation between WMAP and SDSS will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-656056