A survey of weak MgII absorbers at redshift <z>=1.78

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

25 pages, 14 figures, to be published in ApJ 01 March 2006, v639, 1

Scientific paper

10.1086/499261

The exact nature of weak MgII absorbers (those with W_r(2796) < 0.3 A) is a matter of debate, but most are likely related to areas of local star formation or supernovae activity outside of giant galaxies. Using 18 QSO spectra obtained with the Ultra-Violet Echelle Spectrograph (UVES) on the Very Large Telescope (VLT), we have conducted a survey for weak MgII absorbers at 1.4 < z < 2.4. We searched a redshift path length of 8.51, eliminating regions badly contaminated by atmospheric absorption so that the survey is close to 100% complete to W_r(2796) = 0.02 A. We found a total of 9 weak absorbers, yielding a number density of absorbers of dN/dz = 1.06 +/- 0.12 for 0.02 <= W_r(2796) < 0.3 A. Narayanan et al. (2005) found dN/dz = 1.00 +/- 0.20 at 0 < z < 0.3 and Churchill et al. (1999) found dN/dz = 1.74 +/- 0.10 at 0.4 < z < 1.4. Therefore, the population of weak MgII absorbers appears to peak at z~1. We explore the expected evolution of the absorber population subject to a changing extragalactic background radiation (EBR) from z = 0.9 to z = 1.78 (the median redshift of our survey), and find that the result is higher than the observed value. We point out that the peak epoch for weak MgII absorption at z~1 may coincide with the peak epoch of global star formation in the dwarf galaxy environment.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A survey of weak MgII absorbers at redshift <z>=1.78 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A survey of weak MgII absorbers at redshift <z>=1.78, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A survey of weak MgII absorbers at redshift <z>=1.78 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-113328

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.