A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel--Fisher Controversy

Statistics – Methodology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/10-STS342 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of M

Scientific paper

10.1214/10-STS342

In 1866 Gregor Mendel published a seminal paper containing the foundations of modern genetics. In 1936 Ronald Fisher published a statistical analysis of Mendel's data concluding that "the data of most, if not all, of the experiments have been falsified so as to agree closely with Mendel's expectations." The accusation gave rise to a controversy which has reached the present time. There are reasonable grounds to assume that a certain unconscious bias was systematically introduced in Mendel's experimentation. Based on this assumption, a probability model that fits Mendel's data and does not offend Fisher's analysis is given. This reconciliation model may well be the end of the Mendel--Fisher controversy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel--Fisher Controversy does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel--Fisher Controversy, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Statistical Model to Explain the Mendel--Fisher Controversy will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-8329

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.