Statistics
Scientific paper
Mar 1989
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1989metic..24....9h&link_type=abstract
Meteoritics (ISSN 0026-1114), vol. 24, March 1989, p. 9-14.
Statistics
11
Antarctic Regions, Meteorites, Meteoroid Concentration, Statistical Analysis, Mass Distribution, Meteoritic Composition, Temporal Distribution, Meteorites, Antarctic Meteorites, Statistical Analysis, Distribution, Data, Abundance, Yamato Meteorites, Alh Meteorites, Samples, Meteorite, Catalog, Timescale, Comparisons, Classification, Frequency, H Chondrites
Scientific paper
The paper considers the mass frequency distribution and relative compositional abundance statistics for four samples of meteoritic flux. These are modern falls, Antarctic finds, Allan Hills Main Icefield finds, and Yamato finds. Particular attention is given to a comparison between modern falls and Allan Hills Main Icefield finds. The main difference between the modern falls and Antarctic finds is the observed overabundance of Hs in Allan Hills Main Icefield finds.
Cassidy William A.
Harvey Ralph P.
No associations
LandOfFree
A statistical comparison of Antarctic finds and modern falls - Mass frequency distributions and relative abundance by type does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A statistical comparison of Antarctic finds and modern falls - Mass frequency distributions and relative abundance by type, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A statistical comparison of Antarctic finds and modern falls - Mass frequency distributions and relative abundance by type will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1807066