A Rejoinder on Energy versus Impact Indicators

Details A Rejoinder on Energy versus Impact Indicators A Rejoinder on Energy versus Impact Indicators

2011-08-30

arxiv.org/abs/1108.5845v1

Computer Science

Digital Libraries

Scientometrics, in press

Scientific paper

Citation distributions are so skewed that using the mean or any other central tendency measure is ill-advised. Unlike G. Prathap's scalar measures (Energy, Exergy, and Entropy or EEE), the Integrated Impact Indicator (I3) is based on non-parametric statistics using the (100) percentiles of the distribution. Observed values can be tested against expected ones; impact can be qualified at the article level and then aggregated.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

A Rejoinder on Energy versus Impact Indicators does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Rejoinder on Energy versus Impact Indicators, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Rejoinder on Energy versus Impact Indicators will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-728814