A reassessment of the data and models of the gravitational lens Q0957+561

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

28 pages, Latex + 4 figures, accepted for ApJ. Final version, with minor changes. Model parameters in Table 4 corrected

Scientific paper

10.1086/307469

We examine models of the mass distribution for the first known case of gravitational lensing. Several new sets of constraints are used, based on recent observations. We remodel the VLBI observations of the radio jets in the two images of Q0957+561, showing that the previously derived positions and uncertainties were incorrect. We use as additional constraints the candidate lensed pairs of galaxies identified recently with the Hubble Space Telescope. We explore a wider range of lens models than before, and find that the Hubble constant is not tightly constrained once elliptical lens models are considered. We also discuss the systematic uncertainties caused by the cluster containing the lens galaxy. We conclude that additional observations of the candidate lensed galaxies as well as direct measurements of the cluster mass profile are needed before an accurate value of the Hubble constant can be derived from this lens.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A reassessment of the data and models of the gravitational lens Q0957+561 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A reassessment of the data and models of the gravitational lens Q0957+561, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A reassessment of the data and models of the gravitational lens Q0957+561 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-389211

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.