Mathematics – Algebraic Geometry
Scientific paper
2007-11-26
Mathematics
Algebraic Geometry
The paper is suspended since Theorem 2.1.1 is wrong; hence the proofs of main results contain gaps. The author hopes to correc
Scientific paper
The paper is suspended. The reason: as was noted by prof. H. Esnault, Theorem 2.1.1 of the previous version (as well as the related Theorem 6.1.1 of http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/math/pdf/9908/9908037v2.pdf of D. Arapura and P. Sastry) is wrong unless one assumes H to be a generic hyperplane section. Hence the proofs of all results starting from 2.3 contain gaps. The author hopes to correct this (somehow) in a future version. At least, most of the results follow from certain "standard" motivic conjectures (see part 1 of Remark 3.2.4 in the previous version). If the author would not find a way to prove Theorems 2.3.1 and 2.3.2 (without 2.1.1), then in the next version of the preprint the results of section 4 will be deduced from certain conjectures; certainly this is not a very exiting result.
No associations
LandOfFree
A problem with Artin's Vanishing for torsion motivic homology does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A problem with Artin's Vanishing for torsion motivic homology, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A problem with Artin's Vanishing for torsion motivic homology will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-170288