A Note on the Inverse Laplace Transformation of $f(t)$

Mathematics – Classical Analysis and ODEs

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

This paper has been withdrawn by the author due to an incorrect assumption based on equation (0.0.1)

Scientific paper

Let $\mathcal{L}\{f(t)\} = \int_{0}^{\infty}e^{-st}f(t)dt$ denote the Laplace transform of $f$. It is well-known that if $f(t)$ is a piecewise continuous function on the interval $t:[0,\infty)$ and of exponential order for $t > N$; then $\lim_{s\to\infty}F(s) = 0$, where $F(s) = \mathcal{L}\{f(t)\}$. In this paper we prove that the lesser known converse does not hold true; namely, if $F(s)$ is a continuous function in terms of $s$ for which $\lim_{s\to\infty}F(s) = 0$, then it does not follow that $F(s)$ is the Laplace transform of a piecewise continuous function of exponential order.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Note on the Inverse Laplace Transformation of $f(t)$ does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Note on the Inverse Laplace Transformation of $f(t)$, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Note on the Inverse Laplace Transformation of $f(t)$ will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-512684

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.