Other
Scientific paper
Jul 1983
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1983jgr....88.5769a&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 88, July 1, 1983, p. 5769-5772.
Other
26
Auroral Electrojets, Geomagnetism, Indexes (Ratios), Magnetic Disturbances, Polar Substorms, Accuracy, Magnetic Dipoles, Magnetometers, Magnetospheric Instability, Solar Wind
Scientific paper
The accuracy of the present AE(12) index is evaluated by using magnetometer data from the six IMS meridian chains and other high-latitude stations. It is shown that the accuracy of AE(12) becomes progressively worse for lower values. There are at least a few causes for this inaccuracy, and three of them are identified. Although it is not possible to provide a single critical value, one should be cautious about the accuracy of the absolute value of AE(12) less than approximately 250 nT. In particular, since 70 percent of AE(12) values are less than 250 nT, one must be cautious in correlative use of the AE(12) index with solar wind parameters.
Ahn Byung-Ho.
Akasofu Syuh-Ichi
Allen Joe H.
Kamide Yohsuke
No associations
LandOfFree
A note on the accuracy of the auroral electrojet indices does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A note on the accuracy of the auroral electrojet indices, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A note on the accuracy of the auroral electrojet indices will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1628309