Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2003-02-14
Phys.Rev.D67:123503,2003
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
7 pages RevTeX4 file with four figures incorporated
Scientific paper
10.1103/PhysRevD.67.123503
K-essence models, relying on scalar fields with non-canonical kinetic terms, have been proposed as an alternative to quintessence in explaining the observed acceleration of the Universe. We consider the use of field redefinitions to cast k-essence in a more familiar form. While k-essence models cannot in general be rewritten in the form of quintessence models, we show that in certain dynamical regimes an equivalence can be made, which in particular can shed light on the tracking behaviour of k-essence. In several cases, k-essence cannot be observationally distinguished from quintessence using the homogeneous evolution, though there may be small effects on the perturbation spectrum. We make a detailed analysis of two k-essence models from the literature and comment on the nature of the fine tuning arising in the models.
Copeland Edmund J.
Liddle Andrew R.
Malquarti Michael
Trodden Mark
No associations
LandOfFree
A new view of k-essence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A new view of k-essence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A new view of k-essence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-266920