Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1997-11-14
Publ.Astron.Soc.Pac. 110 (1998) 727
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
9 pp., accepted for publication in PASP
Scientific paper
10.1086/316173
Flux estimates for faint sources or transients are systematically biased high because there are far more truly faint sources than bright. Corrections which account for this effect are presented as a function of signal-to-noise ratio and the (true) slope of the faint-source number-flux relation. The corrections depend on the source being originally identified in the image in which it is being photometered. If a source has been identified in other data, the corrections are different; a prescription for calculating the corrections is presented. Implications of these corrections for analyses of surveys are discussed; the most important is that sources identified at signal-to-noise ratios of four or less are practically useless.
Hogg David Wardell
Turner Edwin L.
No associations
LandOfFree
A maximum-likelihood method for improving faint source flux and color estimates does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A maximum-likelihood method for improving faint source flux and color estimates, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A maximum-likelihood method for improving faint source flux and color estimates will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-281112