A decision between Bayesian and Frequentist upper limit in analyzing continuous Gravitational Waves

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Given the sensitivity of current ground-based Gravitational Wave (GW) detectors, any continuous-wave signal we can realistically expect will be at a level or below the background noise. Hence, any data analysis of detector data will need to rely on statistical techniques to separate the signal from the noise. While with the current sensitivity of our detectors we do not expect to detect any true GW signals in our data, we can still set upper limits (UL) on their amplitude. These upper limits, in fact, tell us how weak a signal strength we would detect. In setting upper limit using two popular method, Bayesian and Frequentist, there is always the question of a realistic results. In this paper, we try to give an estimate of how realistically we can set the upper limit using the above mentioned methods. And if any, which one is preferred for our future data analysis work.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A decision between Bayesian and Frequentist upper limit in analyzing continuous Gravitational Waves does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A decision between Bayesian and Frequentist upper limit in analyzing continuous Gravitational Waves, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A decision between Bayesian and Frequentist upper limit in analyzing continuous Gravitational Waves will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-672120

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.