A data-analysis driven comparison of analytic and numerical coalescing binary waveforms: nonspinning case

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

19 pages, 17 figures, added references, corrected typos, changed figure 16

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024014

We compare waveforms obtained by numerically evolving nonspinning binary black holes to post-Newtonian (PN) template families currently used in the search for gravitational waves by ground-based detectors. We find that the time-domain 3.5PN template family, which includes the inspiral phase, has fitting factors (FFs) >= 0.96 for binary systems with total mass M = 10 ~ 20 Msun. The time-domain 3.5PN effective-one-body template family, which includes the inspiral, merger and ring-down phases, gives satisfactory signal-matching performance with FFs >= 0.96 for binary systems with total mass M = 10 ~ 120 Msun. If we introduce a cutoff frequency properly adjusted to the final black-hole ring-down frequency, we find that the frequency-domain stationary-phase-approximated template family at 3.5PN order has FFs >= 0.96 for binary systems with total mass M = 10 ~ 20 Msun. However, to obtain high matching performances for larger binary masses, we need to either extend this family to unphysical regions of the parameter space or introduce a 4PN order coefficient in the frequency-domain GW phase. Finally, we find that the phenomenological Buonanno-Chen-Vallisneri family has FFs >= 0.97 with total mass M=10 ~ 120Msun. The main analyses use the noise spectral-density of LIGO, but several tests are extended to VIRGO and advanced LIGO noise-spectral densities.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A data-analysis driven comparison of analytic and numerical coalescing binary waveforms: nonspinning case does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A data-analysis driven comparison of analytic and numerical coalescing binary waveforms: nonspinning case, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A data-analysis driven comparison of analytic and numerical coalescing binary waveforms: nonspinning case will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-44252

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.