A counterexample to a multilinear endpoint question of Christ and Kiselev

Mathematics – Classical Analysis and ODEs

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

9 pages, no figures, to appear, Math. Res. Letters. More detailed remarks, many minor changes

Scientific paper

Christ and Kiselev have established that the generalized eigenfunctions of one-dimensional Dirac operators with $L^p$ potential $F$ are bounded for almost all energies for $p < 2$. Roughly speaking, the proof involved writing these eigenfunctions as a multilinear series $\sum_n T_n(F, ..., F)$ and carefully bounding each term $T_n(F, ..., F)$. It is conjectured that the results of Christ and Kiselev also hold for $L^2$ potentials $F$. However in this note we show that the bilinear term $T_2(F,F)$ and the trilinear term $T_3(F,F,F)$ are badly behaved on $L^2$, which seems to indicate that multilinear expansions are not the right tool for tackling this endpoint case.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A counterexample to a multilinear endpoint question of Christ and Kiselev does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A counterexample to a multilinear endpoint question of Christ and Kiselev, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A counterexample to a multilinear endpoint question of Christ and Kiselev will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-190104

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.