Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jan 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011aas...21724609a&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #217, #246.09; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 43, 2011
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Scientific paper
In this study we compare the masses of supermassive black holes (SMBH) in 35 galaxies estimated using reverberation mapping to those determined using the SMBH mass versus pitch angle relation. Both methods provide an independent determination of SMBH mass. We selected a sub-sample of nearly face-on spiral galaxies and used IRAF to determine the ellipticity and major-axis position angle in order to deproject the galaxy images to face-on. A two-dimensional Fast Fourier Transform was then applied to the deprojected images in order to measure the spiral arm pitch angles and, thereby, provide a SMBH mass estimate.
Ahdulla Akhlite Al-Baidhany Ismaeel
Bentz Misty
Davis Ben
Kennefick Daniel
Kennefick Julia
No associations
LandOfFree
A Comparison of Two Independent Techniques for Measuring Supermassive Black Hole Masses does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A Comparison of Two Independent Techniques for Measuring Supermassive Black Hole Masses, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of Two Independent Techniques for Measuring Supermassive Black Hole Masses will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1399131