Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Aug 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009aspc..409..277z&link_type=abstract
Cosmology Across Cultures ASP Conference Series, Vol. 409, proceedings of the conference held 8-12 September, 2008, at Parque de
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Scientific paper
The 260 day Mesoamerican ``Sacred Almanac", or sacred calendar, indirectly contains all the solar system information embodied within the law first proposed by Bode in 1772. However, the sacred 260 day calendar of Mesoamerica is more accurate on average, and over two millennia older (Milbrath 1999). Furthermore, it will be shown that the Mesoamerican 260 day calendar is one of the most efficient calendars that can be constructed for tracking planetary motions, but only when the planet Mercury is included in the planet set. This suggests that the calendar's design was intentional, and that Mercury was known to ancient new world astronomers. The number of observational experiments needed to establish the 260 day calendar has also been estimated. In fact, the information burden is substantial, and it is tempting to suggest that the need for astronomical recordkeeping may have given rise to the development of writing in the new world.
No associations
LandOfFree
A Comparison of Two Independent Models of the Solar System: Bode's Law and the 260 Day Mesoamerican Calendar does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A Comparison of Two Independent Models of the Solar System: Bode's Law and the 260 Day Mesoamerican Calendar, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of Two Independent Models of the Solar System: Bode's Law and the 260 Day Mesoamerican Calendar will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-818817