A comparison of the Fourier, Jurkevich, and Stellingwerf methods of period estimation

Details A comparison of the Fourier, Jurkevich, and Stellingwerf methods of period estimation A comparison of the Fourier, Jurkevich, and Stellingwerf methods of period estimation

Jan 1989

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1989aj.....97..280s&link_type=abstract

Astronomical Journal (ISSN 0004-6256), vol. 97, Jan. 1989, p. 280-287.

Statistics

Computation

7

Computational Astrophysics, Fourier Analysis, Periodic Variations, Variable Stars, Data Simulation, Maximum Likelihood Estimates, Statistical Analysis

Scientific paper

The local structure near the sinusoid f0 is examined for the Fourier, Jurkevich, and Stellingwerf period estimation techniques in the simplest case of a single noisy sinusoid. Evidence is sought for the superiority of the non-Fourier techniques in terms of frequency and amplitude estimation. The background noise field in the periodograms is examined to seek evidence of better noise immunity for the non-Fourier techniques. The results indicate that the sought-for superiority is not found.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

A comparison of the Fourier, Jurkevich, and Stellingwerf methods of period estimation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A comparison of the Fourier, Jurkevich, and Stellingwerf methods of period estimation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparison of the Fourier, Jurkevich, and Stellingwerf methods of period estimation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-825473