A Comparison of Logic Programming Approaches for Representation and Solving of Constraint Satisfaction Problems

Computer Science – Logic in Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

9 pages, 3 figures submitted to NMR 2000, April 9-11, Breckenridge, Colorado

Scientific paper

Many logic programming based approaches can be used to describe and solve combinatorial search problems. On the one hand there are definite programs and constraint logic programs that compute a solution as an answer substitution to a query containing the variables of the constraint satisfaction problem. On the other hand there are approaches based on stable model semantics, abduction, and first-order logic model generation that compute solutions as models of some theory. This paper compares these different approaches from point of view of knowledge representation (how declarative are the programs) and from point of view of performance (how good are they at solving typical problems).

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Comparison of Logic Programming Approaches for Representation and Solving of Constraint Satisfaction Problems does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Comparison of Logic Programming Approaches for Representation and Solving of Constraint Satisfaction Problems, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of Logic Programming Approaches for Representation and Solving of Constraint Satisfaction Problems will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-143978

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.