A Comparison of Large All-Sky Catalogs to the Sky

Statistics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Scientific paper

Recent large catalogs, such as the US Naval Observatory's 526,280,881 star A2.0 and 1,036,366,767 star B1.0 Catalogs, the 998,402,801 star Guide Star Catalog II, and the 155,569,249 star (so far) 2 Micron All Sky Survey Point Source Catalog, have revolutionized our ability to do astrometry with CCD images. The recently published FITS World Coordinate System standard has provided a standard way of parameterizing that astrometry, and the WCSTools and SExtractor software packages allow the automation of the ``plate-fitting'' process. New instruments for ground-based observing, such as multi-fiber spectrographs, need very accurate positions for objects even fainter than those in these large catalogs. As part of a survey to be conducted with one of these new spectrographs, we have amassed 1728 15 by 30 arcminute CCD images of a portion of the northern sky. After matching 200 to 400 point sources per image to the various catalogs and fitting world coordinate systems to them, we present statistics as to how well each catalog matches our portion of the sky.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Comparison of Large All-Sky Catalogs to the Sky does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Comparison of Large All-Sky Catalogs to the Sky, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of Large All-Sky Catalogs to the Sky will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1667737

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.