Computer Science – Databases
Scientific paper
Apr 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007chjaa...7..289z&link_type=abstract
Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp. 289-296 (2007).
Computer Science
Databases
5
Astronomical Databases: Miscellaneous, Catalogs, Methods: Data Analysis, Methods: Statistical
Scientific paper
We compare the performance of Bayesian Belief Networks (BBN), Multilayer Perception (MLP) networks and Alternating Decision Trees (ADtree) on separating quasars from stars with the database from the 2MASS and FIRST survey catalogs. Having a training sample of sources of known object types, the classifiers are trained to separate quasars from stars. By the statistical properties of the sample, the features important for classification are selected. We compare the classification results with and without feature selection. Experiments show that the results with feature selection are better than those without feature selection. From the high accuracy found, it is concluded that these automated methods are robust and effective for classifying point sources. They may all be applied to large survey projects (e.g. selecting input catalogs) and for other astronomical issues, such as the parameter measurement of stars and the redshift estimation of galaxies and quasars.
Zhang Yan-Xia
Zhao Yong-Heng
No associations
LandOfFree
A Comparison of BBN, ADTree and MLP in separating Quasars from Large Survey Catalogues does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A Comparison of BBN, ADTree and MLP in separating Quasars from Large Survey Catalogues, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of BBN, ADTree and MLP in separating Quasars from Large Survey Catalogues will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1078367