Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Feb 1982
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1982cemec..26..207d&link_type=abstract
(Conference on Analytical Methods and Ephemerides: Theory and Observations of the Moon and Planets, Namur, Belgium, July 28-31,
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
5
Asteroids, Astrometry, Celestial Reference Systems, Solar Orbits, Asteroids, Techniques, Comparisons, Positon(Location), Data, Procedure, Motion, Earth-Based Observations, Astrometry, Hypatia 238 Asteroid
Scientific paper
Differential and absolute minor planet positions previously applied to the study of a Fundamental Reference System have had accuracies of the order of + or - 0.2 arcsec. Relative positions have been obtained to much higher accuracy, but that accuracy has not been applied directly to the formation of a celestial coordinate system. The regular motions of minor planets along long arcs in the sky are more accurately known than any single observed position. Thus, the dynamics of minor planets, coupled with new techniques of observation and reduction, will bring an independent component to bear on the problem of testing the Fundamental Reference System. Preliminary results based on measurements of Hypatia (238) are presented.
Duncombe Raynor L.
Hemenway Paul Derek
No associations
LandOfFree
A comparison of astrometric measurement techniques as applied to minor planets does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A comparison of astrometric measurement techniques as applied to minor planets, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparison of astrometric measurement techniques as applied to minor planets will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1647274