A Comparison between Supervised Learning Algorithms for Word Sense Disambiguation

Computer Science – Computation and Language

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6 pages

Scientific paper

This paper describes a set of comparative experiments, including cross-corpus evaluation, between five alternative algorithms for supervised Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD), namely Naive Bayes, Exemplar-based learning, SNoW, Decision Lists, and Boosting. Two main conclusions can be drawn: 1) The LazyBoosting algorithm outperforms the other four state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of accuracy and ability to tune to new domains; 2) The domain dependence of WSD systems seems very strong and suggests that some kind of adaptation or tuning is required for cross-corpus application.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Comparison between Supervised Learning Algorithms for Word Sense Disambiguation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Comparison between Supervised Learning Algorithms for Word Sense Disambiguation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison between Supervised Learning Algorithms for Word Sense Disambiguation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-532358

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.