Computer Science – Computation and Language
Scientific paper
2000-09-22
Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, CoNLL'2000, pp. 31-36
Computer Science
Computation and Language
6 pages
Scientific paper
This paper describes a set of comparative experiments, including cross-corpus evaluation, between five alternative algorithms for supervised Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD), namely Naive Bayes, Exemplar-based learning, SNoW, Decision Lists, and Boosting. Two main conclusions can be drawn: 1) The LazyBoosting algorithm outperforms the other four state-of-the-art algorithms in terms of accuracy and ability to tune to new domains; 2) The domain dependence of WSD systems seems very strong and suggests that some kind of adaptation or tuning is required for cross-corpus application.
Escudero Gerard
Marquez Lluis
Rigau German
No associations
LandOfFree
A Comparison between Supervised Learning Algorithms for Word Sense Disambiguation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A Comparison between Supervised Learning Algorithms for Word Sense Disambiguation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison between Supervised Learning Algorithms for Word Sense Disambiguation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-532358