A comparison between sounding data and WRF forecasts at APEX site

Computer Science – Sound

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Atmospheric Effects, Site Testing

Scientific paper

Five WRF configurations using different soil model, microphysics and planetary boundary layer parameterizations are compared with sounding data launched during a field campaign at APEX (Atacama Pathfinder EXperiment) site. The WRF model does a very good job forecasting PWV and temperature, wind speed and direction vertical profiles over the APEX site. Changes in microphysics parameterizations do not produce appreciable changes in humidity profiles. The Noah land surface model greatly improves the forecasts compared to the 5-layer thermal diffusion scheme. The analysis of daily synoptic conditions shows that difficulties in predicting the diurnal variation of wind direction in clear conditions and the occurrence of dry shallow layers in the atmosphere are some of the error sources in forecasts.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A comparison between sounding data and WRF forecasts at APEX site does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A comparison between sounding data and WRF forecasts at APEX site, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A comparison between sounding data and WRF forecasts at APEX site will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1563906

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.