A case for weakening the Church-Turing Thesis

Mathematics – General Mathematics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

22pages. an updated version of this manuscript is accessible at http://alixcomsi.com/30_Church_Turing_Thesis_Update.pdf . arXi

Scientific paper

We conclude from Goedel's Theorem VII of his seminal 1931 paper that every recursive function f(x_{1}, x_{2}) is representable in the first-order Peano Arithmetic PA by a formula [F(x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3})] which is algorithmically verifiable, but not algorithmically computable, if we assume that the negation of a universally quantified formula of the first-order predicate calculus is always indicative of the existence of a counter-example under the standard interpretation of PA. We conclude that the standard postulation of the Church-Turing Thesis does not hold if we define a number-theoretic formula as effectively computable if, and only if, it is algorithmically verifiable; and needs to be replaced by a weaker postulation of the Thesis as an equivalence.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A case for weakening the Church-Turing Thesis does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A case for weakening the Church-Turing Thesis, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A case for weakening the Church-Turing Thesis will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-244569

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.