A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography

Mathematics – History and Overview

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

56 pages; 3 figures. Corrected misprints

Scientific paper

10.1007/s10699-011-9223-1

We analyze the developments in mathematical rigor from the viewpoint of a Burgessian critique of nominalistic reconstructions. We apply such a critique to the reconstruction of infinitesimal analysis accomplished through the efforts of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass; to the reconstruction of Cauchy's foundational work associated with the work of Boyer and Grabiner; and to Bishop's constructivist reconstruction of classical analysis. We examine the effects of a nominalist disposition on historiography, teaching, and research.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Burgessian critique of nominalistic tendencies in contemporary mathematics and its historiography will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-131867

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.