Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1994-12-01
Astrophys.J.455:1-6,1995
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
16 pages, incl 3 figures. Stone-age postscript replaced by LATeX. Latest version at http://www.sns.ias.edu/~max/brute.html (fa
Scientific paper
10.1086/176549
More than a dozen papers analyzing the COBE data have now appeared. We review the different techniques and compare them to a ``brute force" likelihood analysis where we invert the full 4038 x 4038 Galaxy-cut pixel covariance matrix. This method is optimal in the sense of producing minimal error bars, and is a useful reference point for comparing other analysis techniques. Our maximum-likelihood estimate of the spectral index and normalization are n=1.15 (0.95) and Q=18.2 (21.3) micro-Kelvin including (excluding) the quadrupole. Marginalizing over the normalization C_9, we obtain n=1.10 +/- 0.29 (n=0.90 +/- 0.32). When we compare these results with those of the various techniques that involve a linear ``compression'' of the data, we find that the latter are all consistent with the brute-force analysis and have error bars that are nearly as small as the minimal error bars. We therefore conclude that the data compressions involved in these techniques do indeed retain most of the useful cosmological information.
Bunn Emory
Tegmark Max
No associations
LandOfFree
A brute force analysis of the COBE DMR data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with A brute force analysis of the COBE DMR data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A brute force analysis of the COBE DMR data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-314777