A brief history of the Fail Safe Number in Applied Research

Statistics – Other Statistics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, 1 figure

Scientific paper

Rosenthal's (1979) Fail-Safe-Number (FSN) is probably one of the best known statistics in the context of meta-analysis aimed to estimate the number of unpublished studies in meta-analyses required to bring the meta-analytic mean effect size down to a statistically insignificant level. Already before Scargle's (2000) and Schonemann & Scargle's (2008) fundamental critique on the claimed stability of the basic rationale of the FSN approach, objections focusing on the basic assumption of the FSN which treats the number of studies as unbiased with averaging null were expressed throughout the history of the FSN by different authors (Elashoff, 1978; Iyengar & Greenhouse, 1988a; 1988b; see also Scargle, 2000). In particular, Elashoff's objection appears to be important because it was the very first critique pointing directly to the central problem of the FSN: "R & R claim that the number of studies hidden in the drawers would have to be 65,000 to achieve a mean effect size of zero when combined with the 345 studies reviewed here. But surely, if we allowed the hidden studies to be negative, on the average no more than 345 hidden studies would be necessary to obtain a zero mean effect size" (p. 392). Thus, users of meta-analysis could have been aware right from the beginning that something was wrong with the statistical reasoning of the FSN. In particular, from an applied research perspective, it is therefore of interest whether any of the fundamental objections on the FSN are reflected in standard handbooks on meta-analysis as well as -and of course even more importantly- in meta-analytic studies itself.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A brief history of the Fail Safe Number in Applied Research does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A brief history of the Fail Safe Number in Applied Research, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A brief history of the Fail Safe Number in Applied Research will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-608250

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.