Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
Jul 2002
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002ap%26ss.281..509m&link_type=abstract
Astrophysics and Space Science, v. 281, Issue 1, p. 509-513 (2002).
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Cosmology, Galaxies: Formation
Scientific paper
We show that the canonical prescriptions adopted by current semi-analytic models (SAMs) of hierarchical galaxy formation lead to luminosity functions (LFs) too steep when compared with existing data (obtained from deep multicolor surveys in the HDF-N, HDF-S, NTT-DF in rest-frame B and UV (1700 Å) bands) at redshifts z > 1; the discrepancy grows to a factor ˜ 8 at z ≈ 3. Such result is robust with respect to different recipes for the feedback if this is assumed to arise from the effect of Supernovae contained in the galaxies. When the depletion of satellite galaxies in common haloes due to binary aggregations is taken into account, the discrepancy of SAM predictions with the observed LFs at z > 1 and at z ˜ 3 is appreciably reduced. At z ≈ 0 the effect of binary aggregations is to yield a flatter LF for -20 < M B < -18, but with an upturn at the very faint end for MB-16.
No associations
LandOfFree
The Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function: Theoretical Predictions vs. Observations does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function: Theoretical Predictions vs. Observations, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function: Theoretical Predictions vs. Observations will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-960609