Other
Scientific paper
Oct 2007
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2007aspc..373..253w&link_type=abstract
The Central Engine of Active Galactic Nuclei, ASP Conference Series, Vol. 373, proceedings of the conference held 16-21 October,
Other
3
Scientific paper
The blazar 3C 345 is similar to the gamma-ray blazar 3C 279 in many aspects, but EGRET did not detect any gamma-rays from 3C 345. We investigate this issue by comparing 3C 345 with 3C 279 and 3C 273, another strong gamma-ray blazar, in the following aspects: the optical (4400 Å) and radio (8 GHz,22 GHz, and 37 GHz) variability amplitude, the optical shortest variability timescale, and the time lags among variations in the four bands. However, we do not find any significant differences between 3C 345 and the other two sources. This suggests that the differences in the gamma-ray properties may result from other reasons.
No associations
LandOfFree
Why Did EGRET Not Detect the Blazar 3C 345? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Why Did EGRET Not Detect the Blazar 3C 345?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why Did EGRET Not Detect the Blazar 3C 345? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-953955