Other
Scientific paper
Jan 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992aipc..246...78k&link_type=abstract
Proceedings of the ninth symposium on space nuclear power systems. AIP Conference Proceedings, Volume 246, pp. 78-90 (1992).
Other
Lunar, Planetary, And Deep-Space Probes, Neptune
Scientific paper
Several interesting planetary missions are either enabled for significantly enhanced by nuclear electric propulsion (NEP) in the 50 to 100 kW power range (SP-100 class). These missions include a Pluto Orbiter with a 10-year flight time and several years of operational life in orbit versus a ballistic very fast (13 km/s) flyby which would take longer to get to pluto and would have a very short time to observe the planet. (A ballistic orbiter would take 36 years to get to Pluto.) Other missions include a neptune Orbiter /Probe, a Jupiter Grand Tour orbiting each of the major moons in order, a Jupiter polar orbiter, and a multiple asteroid rendezvous orbiting six selected asteroids. This paper discusses several of the potential missions and compares the Nuclear Electric Propulsion option to the conventional ballistic approach on a parametric basis.
Boain Ronald J.
Chen-Wan Yen L.
Kelley James H.
No associations
LandOfFree
Robotic planetary science missions with NEP does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Robotic planetary science missions with NEP, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Robotic planetary science missions with NEP will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-934270