Other
Scientific paper
Sep 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995metic..30r.535l&link_type=abstract
Meteoritics, vol. 30, no. 5, page 535
Other
2
Asteroids, Dust, Electrophysical Processes, Physical Properties, Regolith, Surfaces
Scientific paper
Electrostatic fields can develop at the surface of resistive asteroids exposed directly to solar radiation and to the solar wind. As on the Moon (e.g., [1-3]), the process may lead to the levitation and transport of charged grains, and contribute to winnowing asteroidal regoliths of their finest particle size fraction. Two commonly proposed mechanisms for the levitation of dust on the Moon are applied to asteroids. The first depends on global scale electrostatic fields and involves the development of a near-surface photoelectron layer over the asteroid's sunlit hemisphere [4,5] ; the second involves local fields near the terminator and particle charging by higher-energy photoelectron emission on the sunlit faces of blocks and other small-scale prominences [6,7]. Preliminary modeling results suggest that on a sufficiently resistive and slow-rotating asteroid at a heliocentric distance of 3 AU, the subsolar region evolves surface electrostatic fields of ~5 V/m^-1, while field intensities in the terminator zone may reach ~10^5 V/m^-1. Charged regolithic fines are easily levitated, their fate being a function of their charge and size. On a 20 km-radius chondritic main belt asteroid, particles up to ~100 microns across may be electro- statically accelerated to escape. Fines <=1 micron across are subject to radiation pressure and/or to solar wind drag as soon as they are lofted, and may be quickly entrained to escape even if initially launched at sub-escape velocities. Larger particles levitated in the sub-escape regime remain gravitationally bound to the asteroid and experience lateral transport along local electrostatic and gravity gradients. The particles may migrate across the asteroid's surface indefinitely or, more likely, until they settle in perenially shadowed areas and/or topographic lows (craters or grooves), thus smoothing the asteroid's topography and minimizing shadows. They will remain on the asteroid until ejected by impacts or until the particles are further comminuted by micrometeoritic sandblasting. Remote-sensing studies of asteroids and the examination of meteorite regolithic breccias indicate that, in comparison to the lunar regolith, asteroidal regoliths are generally deficient in fine-grained material <=100 microns across (i.e. in dust and agglutinates) (e.g., [8,9]). This characteristic, usually attributed to the preferential loss of smaller particles by micrometeoritic bombardment [10], may be in part due to electrostatic winnowing. Surface features on Phobos, Deimos and on asteroids 951 Gaspra and 243 Ida (regional albedo-topography relationships [11-13], dark-floored craters [11,14], grooves [11,15], blocks with possible basal debris aprons [16]) appear consistent with an electrophysical mobilization of fines. The inference from polarimetry [17] that the surfaces of M-type asteroids, which are thought to be metal-rich and thus unlikely to evolve strong fields, are finer-grained than most other types of asteroid surfaces suggests that the size of the smallest particles retained on asteroids may indeed be related to their electrophysical properties. Although many unknowns remain with regard to the actual electrophysical properties of asteroid surfaces and to the true effectiveness of the levitation mechanisms invoked, the available models predict interesting results. Electrostatic levitation offers an additional means of particle segregation, transport, and removal on asteroids. The process is expected to be more effective closer to the sun, on less massive objects, on asteroids with a slower spin rate, on the more resistive surfaces, over the more rugged terrain, for less dense particles, and for smaller grains. References: [1] Rennilson J. J. and Criswell D. R. (1974) Moon, 10, 121-142. [2] Berg O. E. et al. (1974) GRL, 1, 289. [3] Whipple E. C. (1981) Rept. Prog. Phys., 44, 1197-1250. [4] Singer S. F. and Walker E. H. (1962) Icarus, 1, 7-12. [5] Mendis D. A. et al. (1981) Astrophys. J., 249, 789-797. [6] Criswell D. R. (1973) in Photons and Particle Interactions with Surfaces in Space (R. Grard, ed.), 545-556. [7] De B. R. and Criswell D. R. (1977) JGR, 82, 999-1004. [8] McKay D. S. et al. (1989) in Asteroids II (R. Binzel et al., eds.), 617-642. [9] Bunch T. E. and Rajan R. S. (1988) in Meteorites and the Early Solar System (J. Kerridge and M. Matthews, eds.), 144-164. [10] Matson D. L. et al. (1977). Proc. LSC 8th, 1001-1011. [11] Thomas P. and Veverka J. (1979) in Asteroids (T. Gehrels, ed.), 628-651. [12] Helfenstein P. et al. (1994) Icarus, 107, 37-60. [13] Helfenstein P. et al. (1995) Icarus, submitted. [14] Sullivan R. et al. (1995) Icarus, submitted. [15] Veverka J. et al. (1994) Icarus, 107, 72-83. [16] Lee P. et al. (1995) Icarus, submitted. [17] Dollfus A. et al. (1989) in Asteroids II (R. Binzel et al., eds.), 594-616.
No associations
LandOfFree
Electrostatic Levitation of Fines on Asteroids does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Electrostatic Levitation of Fines on Asteroids, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Electrostatic Levitation of Fines on Asteroids will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-830744