Computer Science
Scientific paper
Sep 1995
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1995metic..30q.485b&link_type=abstract
Meteoritics, vol. 30, no. 5, page 485
Computer Science
1
Classification, Meteorites, Caddo County, Copiapo, Iab Iron, Jenny'S Creek, Lueders, Odessa, San Cristobal, Stony-Iron, Tacubaya, Toluca, Silicate Inclusions
Scientific paper
IAB irons are the largest group of iron meteorites, exhibit a large range of siderophile element concentrations in their metal, and commonly contain silicate inclusions with roughly chondritic composition. They are closely related to IIICD irons [1,2] and their inclusions resemble winonaites [3]. It has been suggested that IAB's and IIICD's formed in individual impact melt pools [4,2] on a common parent body. However, it has also been suggested that fractional crystallization [5,6] of a S-saturated core could produce the observed siderophile element trends. Metal composition is correlated with silicate inclusion mineralogy in IIICD's [1], indicating reactions between solid silicates and the metallic magma in a core. These trends observed in IIICD's differ from those in IAB's, suggesting different parent bodies. A bi-modal grouping, based primarily on mineralogy and mineral abundances, was suggested for IAB inclusions [7]. However, recent recoveries of several new silicate-bearing IAB's, along with the emergence of new ideas on their origins, prompted a comprehensive study to document more fully the range of inclusions within IAB irons, to examine possible correlations between the compositions of the metallic host and the silicate inclusions, and to elucidate the origin of IAB irons. We are studying troilite-graphite-silicate inclusions in 24 IAB irons with Ni concentrations ranging from 6.6-25.0%. These include Odessa and Copiapo types [7], newly recovered meteorites (e.g., Lueders [8]) and meteorites with extreme Ni contents (e.g., Jenny's Creek, 6.8%; San Cristobal, 25.0% [9]). The inclusions exhibit a range of textures from recrystallized to partial melts (e.g., Caddo County [10]). Rigorous classification [7] is hampered by heterogeneities between group meteorites, between different samples of distinct meteorites, and within individual inclusions. While intergroup heterogeneities make comparisons between the suite of IAB's somewhat difficult, some general trends do exist. Inclusion mineralogy progresses from graphite-troilite nodules in low Ni IAB's, to silicate-dominated inclusions in high Ni IAB's. With increasing Ni abundance in the metal, systematic variations are found in several properties. Two groups are delineated on a Ni vs Fa content plot and both are positively correlated with Ni content. Graphite abundance noticeably decreases with increasing Ni content [7]. Graphite location also varies with Ni: graphite is primarily found interstitial to the silicates in low Ni IAB's, but is located at metal-silicate boundaries in those with higher Ni abundances. With increasing Ni, daubreelite disappears. Inclusion shape also varies [7]: more angular inclusions are associated with low Ni, while more rounded inclusions exist at high Ni contents. These systematic changes suggest interaction between the silicate inclusions and an evolving metallic magma. Troilite and graphite abundances may be related to early nucleation on silicates, hence their depletion in high Ni (later crystallizing) irons. The presence of abundant graphite creates reducing conditions which would result in the formation of daubreelite. Conditions become more oxidizing with loss of graphite, evidenced by lack of daubreelite and more FeO-rich silicates in high Ni irons. Although an overall trend exists, the story is complicated by heterogeneities. Significant variations are found between paired samples (e.g., Toluca and Tacubaya), as well as within individual inclusions (daubreelite and chromite in same inclusion). Local oxidation conditions may be controlled by graphite abundance. Heterogeneities within specific meteorites need documentation. Most of the inclusions exhibit similar textural (metamorphic) features, but a few show evidence of partial melting and melt migration, further complicating the parent body history. While a variety of processes (oxidation-reduction, metamorphism, partial melting) affected the inclusions during formation, systematic changes observed here indicate that the silicates were interacting with a single evolving metallic magma. We suggest that the requirement for a common system is more compatible with core formation [5,6] than with impact-melt pools [2,4]. References: [1] McCoy T. J. et al. (1993) Meteoritics, 28, 552-560. [2] Choi B.-G. et al. (1995) GCA, 59, 593-612. [3] Benedix G. K. et al. (1995) LPS XXVI, 99-100. [4] Wasson J. T. et al. (1980) Z. Naturforsch., 35a, 781-795. [5] Kracher A. (1982) GRL, 9, 412-415. [6] Kracher A. (1985) Proc. LPSC 15th, in JGR, 90, C689-C698. [7] Bunch T. E. et al. (1970) Contrib. Mineral. Petrol., 25, 297-340. [8] McCoy et al. (1995) Meteoritics, in preparation. [9] Scott E. R. D. and Bild R. W. (1974) GCA, 38, 1379-1391. [10] Takeda H. et al. (1993) Meteoritics, 28, 447.
Benedix Gretchen K.
Keil Klaus
McCoy Timothy James
No associations
LandOfFree
Silicate Inclusions in IAB Irons: Correlations Between Metal Composition and Inclusion Properties, and Inferences for Their Origin does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Silicate Inclusions in IAB Irons: Correlations Between Metal Composition and Inclusion Properties, and Inferences for Their Origin, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Silicate Inclusions in IAB Irons: Correlations Between Metal Composition and Inclusion Properties, and Inferences for Their Origin will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-829877