Other
Scientific paper
Dec 1996
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1996angeo..14.1297l&link_type=abstract
Annales Geophysicae, vol. 14, Issue 12, pp.1297-1304
Other
11
Scientific paper
Several authors have published models of auroral conductances in the past. Some of them are based on theoretical approaches; others are the result of observations. The data bases for the latter models range from 8 h to 3 years of experiments. In this paper, we show the results of our own modeling, based on a coupled ki- netic/fluid approach. We compare these results to the sta- tistical model based on 3 years of experiment. We then model the auroral ionospheric conductances above EISCAT and the EISCAT-Svalbard Radar for different solar-activity indices. These modeled conductances are fitted with a simple law depending on the f10.7 index and on the solar zenith angle.
Alcaydé Denis
Blelly Pierre-Louis
Kofman Wlodek
Lilensten Jean
No associations
LandOfFree
Auroral ionospheric conductivities: a comparison between experiment and modeling, and theoretical f 10.7 -dependent model for EISCAT and ESR does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Auroral ionospheric conductivities: a comparison between experiment and modeling, and theoretical f 10.7 -dependent model for EISCAT and ESR, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Auroral ionospheric conductivities: a comparison between experiment and modeling, and theoretical f 10.7 -dependent model for EISCAT and ESR will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-819071