Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jan 2006
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2006mnras.365..827o&link_type=abstract
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 365, Issue 3, pp. 827-832.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
14
Sun: Activity, Sun: Magnetic Fields, Sunspots
Scientific paper
To investigate the shape of the solar cycle, we have performed a wavelet analysis of the large-scale magnetic field data for 1960-2000 for several latitudinal belts and have isolated the following quasi-periodic components: ~22, 7 and 2 yr. The main 22-yr oscillation dominates all latitudinal belts except the latitudes of +/-30° from the equator. The butterfly diagram for the nominal 22-yr oscillation shows a standing dipole wave in the low-latitude domain (|θ|<= 30°) and another wave in the sub-polar domain (|θ|>= 35°), which migrates slowly polewards. The phase shift between these waves is about π. The nominal 7-yr oscillation yields a butterfly diagram with two domains. In the low-latitude domain (|θ|<= 35°), the dipole wave propagates equatorwards and in the sub-polar region, polewards. The nominal 2-yr oscillation is much more chaotic than the other two modes; however the waves propagate polewards whenever they can be isolated.
We conclude that the shape of the solar cycle inferred from the large-scale magnetic field data differs significantly from that inferred from sunspot data. Obviously, the dynamo models for a solar cycle must be generalized to include large-scale magnetic field data. We believe that sunspot data give adequate information concerning the magnetic field configuration deep inside the convection zone (say, in overshoot later), while the large-scale magnetic field is strongly affected by meridional circulation in its upper layer. This interpretation suggests that the poloidal magnetic field is affected by the polewards meridional circulation, whose velocity is comparable with that of the dynamo wave in the overshoot layer. The 7- and 2-yr oscillations could be explained as a contribution of two sub-critical dynamo modes with the corresponding frequencies.
Kuzanyan Kirill M.
Obridko Vladimir N.
Shelting B. D.
Sokoloff Dimitry
Zakharov V. G.
No associations
LandOfFree
Solar cycle according to mean magnetic field data does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Solar cycle according to mean magnetic field data, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Solar cycle according to mean magnetic field data will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-794724