Reply to comment by M. Hagerty and S. Sherburn on `External modulation of volcanic activity'

Details Reply to comment by M. Hagerty and S. Sherburn on `External modulation of volcanic activity' Reply to comment by M. Hagerty and S. Sherburn on `External modulation of volcanic activity'

Mar 2002

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2002geoji.148..695n&link_type=abstract

Geophysical Journal International, Volume 148, Issue 3, pp. 695-696.

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astronomy

: Convolution, Data Gaps, Modulation, Volcanic Activity

Scientific paper

This reply is based on the re-evaluation of an original data set of spectral seismic amplitudes on short-period seismic stations on Ruapehu, New Zealand, recorded in 1990. While there is agreement that a diurnal peak in the tremor spectrum on Ruapehu is most probably caused by man-made noise, there is disagreement in how to treat time-series adequately in the presence of data gaps. It is demonstrated why Hagerty and Sherburn fail to detect peaks of spectral energy.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reply to comment by M. Hagerty and S. Sherburn on `External modulation of volcanic activity' does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reply to comment by M. Hagerty and S. Sherburn on `External modulation of volcanic activity', we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reply to comment by M. Hagerty and S. Sherburn on `External modulation of volcanic activity' will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-781103