Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Apr 2011
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2011newa...16..147g&link_type=abstract
New Astronomy, Volume 16, Issue 3, p. 147-151.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
3
Scientific paper
Using the Hilbert-Huang Transform (HHT) method, we investigate the periodicity in the monthly mean flare indices from 1966 to 2007 (corresponding to almost four complete solar cycles), calculated by T. Atac and A. Ozguc. The results show as following. (1) The periods of 9.37 ± 2.53, 11.8 ± 0.172 and 23.6 ± 0.316 years are found to be statistically significant in the flare index. The most eminent period is 9.37 ± 2.53 years. (2) Other periods of 0.237 ± 0.196 years (86.6 ± 71.6 days), 0.525 ± 0.0508 years (191 ± 18.5 days), 1.05 ± 0.478 years (383 ± 174 days) and 2.37 ± 0.395 years are below the 99% confidence level line, suggesting they are due to stochastic random noise.
Gao Peng-Xin
Liang Hong-Fei
Zhu Wenguang
No associations
LandOfFree
Periodicity of flare index revisited using the Hilbert-Huang transform method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Periodicity of flare index revisited using the Hilbert-Huang transform method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Periodicity of flare index revisited using the Hilbert-Huang transform method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-767392