The distances of less-evolved planetary nebulae: a further test of statistical distance scales

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

9

Ism: Jets And Outflows, Planetary Nebulae: General

Scientific paper

It has recently been pointed out that a number of the methods used to determine planetary nebulae (PNe) distances may be appreciably in error. Whilst the scales of Zhang (1995), Bensby & Lundstrom (2001) and others are appropriate for higher radio brightness temperatures TB, those of Phillips and Daub are more relevant where TB is small.
We note, in the following, that the absolute bolometric magnitudes of less-evolved PNe are likely to be similar. The mean value of can therefore be used to constrain PNe distances D, and confirm the distance scales for higher TB outflows. We have used this procedure to evaluate distances to a further 47 PNe, and we find that the mean values of are consistent with those of Cahn, Kaler & Stanghellini (1992), Zhang (1995), Phillips et al. (2004) and van de Steene & Zijlstra (1995). They are, as expected, inconsistent with the lower TB scale of Phillips (2002a).

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The distances of less-evolved planetary nebulae: a further test of statistical distance scales does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The distances of less-evolved planetary nebulae: a further test of statistical distance scales, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The distances of less-evolved planetary nebulae: a further test of statistical distance scales will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-760827

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.