The magnitude-redshift relation for 561 Abell clusters

Mathematics – Logic

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

36

Galactic Clusters, Hubble Diagram, Red Shift, Bias, Cosmology, Estimating, Magnitude

Scientific paper

The Hubble diagram for the 561 Abell clusters with measured redshifts has been examined using Abell's (1958) corrected photo-red magnitudes for the tenth-ranked cluster member (m10). After correction for the Scott effect and K dimming, the data are in good agreement with a linear magnitude-redshift relation with a slope of 0.2 out to z = 0.1. New redshift data are also presented for 20 Abell clusters. Abell's m10 is suitable for redshift estimation for clusters with m10 of no more than 16.5. At fainter m10, the number of foreground galaxies expected within an Abell radius is large enough to make identification of the tenth-ranked galaxy difficult. Interlopers bias the estimated redshift toward low values at high redshift. Leir and van den Bergh's (1977) redshift estimates suffer from this same bias but to a smaller degree because of the use of multiple cluster parameters. Constraints on deviations of cluster velocities from the mean cosmological flow require greater photometric accuracy than is provided by Abell's m10 magnitudes.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The magnitude-redshift relation for 561 Abell clusters does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The magnitude-redshift relation for 561 Abell clusters, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The magnitude-redshift relation for 561 Abell clusters will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-752852

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.