Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Dec 1984
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1984orli...14..391b&link_type=abstract
Origins of Life, Volume 14, Issue 1-4, pp. 391-396
Mathematics
Logic
3
Scientific paper
The attempts to explain the origin of natural optical activity through external, extrabiological, agents, typically ionizing rays, i.e. as a purely incidental effect without deeper significance, have failed and should be abandoned. An alternative, intrabiological, Darwinian, explanation seeks to explain optical activity as a necessary phenomenon in early evolution. This explanation is based on the idea that organisms with the existing stereospecificity initially happened, by chance, to be more efficient than organisms with the opposite stereospecificity on independent grounds that have nothing to do with their stereospecifity. If cells based on L aminoacids are called L cells, it is to be assumed that cosmic bodies carrying L cells are about equally frequent as those carrying D cells.
No associations
LandOfFree
Dissident Remarks on the Origin of Optical Activity - an Intrabiological Explanation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Dissident Remarks on the Origin of Optical Activity - an Intrabiological Explanation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dissident Remarks on the Origin of Optical Activity - an Intrabiological Explanation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-739016