Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields

Details Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields

Apr 2004

adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2004e%26psl.221..409a&link_type=abstract

Earth and Planetary Science Letters, Volume 221, Issue 1-4, p. 409-419.

Other

20

Numerical Dynamo Simulation, Axial Dipole, Equatorial Dipole, Uranus, Neptune, Magnetic Field

Scientific paper

We present several numerical simulations of a self-consistent dynamo model in a rotating spherical shell. The solutions have two different field configurations. Besides magnetic fields dominated by the axial dipole component, we also find configurations where a dipole in the equatorial plane is the dominating component. Both types are stable in a parameter regime of intermediate shell thickness and Rayleigh numbers close to onset of convection. Axial dipole solutions are subcritical in all the simulations explored while the equatorial dipole cases are supercritical at low Rayleigh numbers but become metastable at higher Rayleigh numbers. The magnetic field strength saturates at a much lower amplitude for the equatorial dipole dynamos, and the Elsasser number is significantly smaller than in the axial configuration. The reason is that the mainly horizontal field in the equatorial dipole solution is incompatible with the motion of convective cyclones and anticyclones. The axial dipole field, on the other hand, is predominantly aligned with the axis of anticyclones, only cyclones are disrupted by horizontal field lines passing through. This configuration can therefore accomodate stronger convective flows and, consequently, is the only one remaining stable at higher Rayleigh numbers. These arguments should pertain in all planetary dynamos that are governed by strong rotational constraints. They offer an explanation why the Elsasser numbers inferred for Uranus and Neptune are much lower than the Elsasser numbers of Jupiter, Saturn, and Earth.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Axial vs. equatorial dipolar dynamo models with implications for planetary magnetic fields will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-733483