Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2006-05-31
JCAP 0703:019,2007
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
26 pages. v2: added comments about the approximations used, published JCAP version
Scientific paper
10.1088/1475-7516/2007/03/019
We study the Likelihood function of data given f_NL for the so-called local type of non-Gaussianity. In this case the curvature perturbation is a non-linear function, local in real space, of a Gaussian random field. We compute the Cramer-Rao bound for f_NL and show that for small values of f_NL the 3-point function estimator saturates the bound and is equivalent to calculating the full Likelihood of the data. However, for sufficiently large f_NL, the naive 3-point function estimator has a much larger variance than previously thought. In the limit in which the departure from Gaussianity is detected with high confidence, error bars on f_NL only decrease as 1/ln Npix rather than Npix^-1/2 as the size of the data set increases. We identify the physical origin of this behavior and explain why it only affects the local type of non-Gaussianity, where the contribution of the first multipoles is always relevant. We find a simple improvement to the 3-point function estimator that makes the square root of its variance decrease as Npix^-1/2 even for large f_NL, asymptotically approaching the Cramer-Rao bound. We show that using the modified estimator is practically equivalent to computing the full Likelihood of f_NL given the data. Thus other statistics of the data, such as the 4-point function and Minkowski functionals, contain no additional information on f_NL. In particular, we explicitly show that the recent claims about the relevance of the 4-point function are not correct. By direct inspection of the Likelihood, we show that the data do not contain enough information for any statistic to be able to constrain higher order terms in the relation between the Gaussian field and the curvature perturbation, unless these are orders of magnitude larger than the size suggested by the current limits on f_NL.
Creminelli Paolo
Senatore Leonardo
Zaldarriaga Matias
No associations
LandOfFree
Estimators for local non-Gaussianities does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Estimators for local non-Gaussianities, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Estimators for local non-Gaussianities will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-729366