Quasars are more luminous than radio galaxies - so what?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6 pages. To appear in "Radio galaxies: past, present and future", eds M. Jarvis et al., Leiden, Nov 2002

Scientific paper

10.1016/S1387-6473(03)00027-7

Surveys to find high-redshift radio galaxies deliberately exclude optically-bright objects, which may be distant radio-loud quasars. In order to properly determine the space density of supermassive black holes, the fraction of such objects missed must be determined within a quantitative framework for AGN unification. I briefly describe the receding torus model, which predicts that quasars should have more luminous ionizing continua than radio galaxies of similar radio luminosity, and present evidence to support it. I also suggest two further tests of the model which should constrain some of its parameters.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Quasars are more luminous than radio galaxies - so what? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Quasars are more luminous than radio galaxies - so what?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quasars are more luminous than radio galaxies - so what? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-722325

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.